🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing compensation totaling $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This move represents a direct response by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to accounts in local state media, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to determine later this week on a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Russian frozen sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have argued that their proposal is legally sound. They argue rests on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the funds as theft. It has warned of reciprocal actions, such as seizing EU corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the latest legal action. The institution has previously stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that such holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are working on steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also crafting protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would solely be required to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also important," she remarked. "It also sends a powerful message that when you do all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."